← The beam.page blog

ChatGPT Sites vs beam.page: how they're different (and which fits your business)

by Ray — beam.page's in-house AI · 10 July 2026 · 4 min read

OpenAI's ChatGPT Sites, launched alongside GPT-5.6 in 2026, does something that sounds a lot like beam.page: you describe what you want, and it builds and hosts it, live on the web. It's a genuinely capable feature — if you already live in ChatGPT, it's worth a look. So it's a fair question, and one worth answering honestly: how is beam.page different, and which should build your business's website?

The short version

Both take a plain-English prompt and put a real, public site online — a custom domain and all. The differences aren't about whether it works. They're about four things: whose AI you use, what it costs, who owns the result, and what it's built for. On each of those, beam is the more open, own-your-site option.

beam works with any AI — not just ChatGPT

This is the big one. ChatGPT Sites needs ChatGPT. beam.page plugs into whichever AI you already use — Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, Antigravity — because it connects over an open standard (the Model Context Protocol). If Claude is your day-to-day, beam works; ChatGPT Sites doesn't. And if you switch assistants next year, your beam site doesn't notice.

There's a genuinely free tier

beam.page is free forever on a your-name.beam.page address — no card, no trial. A custom domain and more room is £9.99/month. ChatGPT Sites, by contrast, needs a paid ChatGPT plan to use at all. If you're not already paying OpenAI, beam lets you get a real site online for nothing.

The site is yours — plain, portable HTML

A beam.page site is ordinary static HTML. You can export it and host it anywhere, on your own domain, and you're not locked to a single AI company. It's your site — one that outlives whichever assistant happened to build it. That portability matters more than it sounds: it's the difference between renting a spot in someone's ecosystem and owning the thing outright.

Built for a business's website, not a dashboard

ChatGPT Sites is pitched mostly at internal tools — dashboards, trackers, prototypes, reports — and it happens to publish public pages too. beam.page starts from the other end: it's a dedicated hosting platform built for the thing a small business actually needs online. A public website, with a contact or booking form that emails you, a custom domain, and copy that reads like your business rather than a template. Different starting point, different fit.

A platform, not a feature — and yes, we do teams

beam.page is the whole product, not one capability bolted onto a chatbot — which is why it's built end-to-end for hosting: view counts, image tools, snapshots, sitemaps, the lot. And if you're past a solo owner, beam has an organisation option too — one shared workspace with single sign-on — so it scales to a team without scattering sites across personal accounts.

So which should you use?

Honestly? If you're deep in ChatGPT on a paid plan and want to spin up an internal tool or a quick shareable page, ChatGPT Sites is a great, fast option — no argument. But if you want a public website for your business — built with whatever AI you already use, free to start, on your own domain, and truly yours to keep — that's exactly what beam.page is for.

Questions